REFERÊNCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS

AB’SÁBER, A. N. Diretrizes para uma política de preservação de reservas naturais no Estado de São Paulo. Geografia e planejamento, v. 30, p. 1-8, 1977.

ABBRUZZESE, B.; S. G. LEIBOWITZ. A synoptic approach for assessing cumulative impacts to wetlands. Environmental management, v. 21, n. 3, p. 457-475, 1997.

AGRA FILHO, S. S. Situação atual e perspectivas da avaliação de impacto ambiental no Brasil. In: SÁNCHEZ, L. E. (Org.). Avaliação de impacto ambiental: situação atual e perspectivas. São Paulo: Epusp, 1993. p. 153-156.

AHAMMED, R.; HARVEY, N. Evaluation of environmental impact assessment procedures and practices in Bangladesh. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 22, n. 1, p. 63-78, 2004.

ALLOWAY, B. J.; AYRES, D. C. Chemical principles of environmental pollution. London: Blackie Academic & Professional, 1993.

ALTON, C. C.; UNDERWOOD, P. B. Let us make impact assessment more accessible. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 23, p. 141-153, 2003.

ANDRÉ, P. et al. L’évaluation des impacts sur l’environnement. Processus, acteurs et pratique pour un développement durable. 2. ed. Montreal, Presses Internationales Polytechnique, 2003.

ANDRÉ, P.; B. ENSERINK, B.; CONNOR, D,; CROAL, P. Public Participation International Best Practice Principles. Special Publication Series No. 4. Fargo, International Association for Impact Assessment, 2006.

ANDREWS, R. L. N. Environmental impact assessment and risk assessment: learning from each other. In: WATHERN, P. (Org.). Environmental impact assessment: theory and practice. London: Unwin Hyman, 1988. p. 85-97.

ANTUNES, P.; SANTOS, R.; JORDÃO, L. The application of geographical information systems to determine environmental impact significance. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 21, p. 511-535, 2001.

ARMOUR, A. Methodological problems in social impact monitoring. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 8, p. 249-265, 1988.

ARNSTEIN, S. R. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the american institute of planners, v. 35, n. 4, p. 216-224, 1969.

ARTS, J. EIA follow-up: on the role of ex post evaluation in environmental impact assessment. Groningen: Geo Press, 1998.

ARTS, J.; CALDWELL, P.; MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A. Environmental impact assessment follow-up: good practice and future directions – findings from a workshop at the IAIA 2000 Conference. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 20, n. 4, p. 229-304, 2001.

ARTS, J.; MEIJER, J. Designing for EIA follow-up: experiences from The Netherlands. In: MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A.; ARTS, J. (Orgs.), Assessing impact: handbook of EIA and SEA follow-up. London: Earthscan, 2004, p. 63-96.

AUERBACH, S. I. et al. Environmental impact statements. Science, v. 193, p. 248, 1976.

AWAZU, L. A. M. Análise, avaliação e gerenciamento de riscos no processo de avaliação de impactos ambientais. In: JUCHEM, P.A. (Org.). Manual de avaliação de impactos ambientais. 2. ed. Curitiba, Instituto Ambiental do Paraná/Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit, 1993. p. 3200-3254.

AZINGER, K. L. Methodology for developing a stakeholder-based external affairs strategy. CIM Bulletin, p. 87-93, April 1998.

BACK, P. A. A. Designing safety into dams. Water power & dam construction, p. 11-12, February, 1990.

BAILEY, J. Environmental impact assessment and management: an underexplored relationship. Environmental management, v. 21, n. 3, p. 317-327, 1997.

BAILEY, J.; HOBBS, V.; MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A. Environmental auditing: artificial waterway developments in Western Australia. Journal of environmental management, v. 34, p. 1-13, 1992.

BAINES, J.; McCLINTOCK, TAYLOR, N.; BUCKENHAM, B. Using local knowledge. In: BECKER, B.; VANCLAY, F. (Orgs.). The international handbook of social impact assessment: conceptual and methodological advances. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, p. 26-41.

BALBY, C. N; NAPOLITANO, C. M.; FERNANDES, E. S. L. Usina termoelétrica de Paulínia. In: LIMA, A. L. B. R.; TEIXEIRA, H. R.; SÁNCHEZ, L. E. (Orgs.). A efetividade do processo de avaliação de impacto ambiental no Estado de São Paulo: uma análise a partir de estudos de caso. São Paulo: Secretaria do Meio Ambiente do Estado, 1995. p. 67-75.

BALMFORD, A. et al. Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science, v. 297, p. 950-953, 2002.

BAPE – BUREAU D’AUDIENCES PUBLIQUES SUR L’ENVIRONNEMENT. Le BAPE et la gestion des conflits: bilan et perspectives. Québec: BAPE, 1986.

______. La médiation en environnement: une nouvelle approche du BAPE. Québec: BAPE, 1994a.

______. Rapport Annuel 1993-1994. Sainte-Foy: Les Publications du Québec, 1994b.

BARBOSA, R.I.; FEARNSIDE, P. M. Erosão do solo na Amazônia: estudo de caso na região de Apiaú, Roraima, Brasil. Acta Amazonica v. 30, n. 4, p. 601-613, 2000.

BAROUCH, G.; THEYS, J. L’Environnement dans la négotiation et l’analyse des projets: que faire de plus que les études d’impact? Cahiers du GERMES, v. 12, p. 3-23, 1987. (Groupe d’Explorations et de Recherches Multidisciplinaires sur l’Environnement, Paris.)

BARRASS, R. Os cientistas precisam escrever. São Paulo: T. A. Queiroz/Edusp, 1979.

BARTHES, R. Le texte et l’image. Paris: Ed. Paris Musées, 1986.

BAXTER, W.; ROSS, W. A.; SPALING, H. Improving the practice of cumulative effects assessment in Canada. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 19, n. 4, p. 253-262, 2001.

BBOP, Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme. To no net loss and beyond: an overview of the business and biodiversity offsets programme (BBOP). Washington, DC: Forest Trends, 2013.

BEANLANDS, G. Scoping methods and baseline studies in EIA. In: WATHERN, P. (Org.). Environmental impact assessment. Theory and practice. London: Unwin Hyman, 1988. p. 31-46.

______. Environmental assessment requirements at the World Bank. In: SÁNCHEZ, L. E. (Org.). Avaliação de impacto ambiental: situação atual e perspectivas. São Paulo: Epusp, 1993a. p. 91-101.

______. Forecasts, uncertainties and the scientific contents of environmental impact assessment. In: SÁNCHEZ, L. E. (Org.). Avaliação de impacto ambiental: situação atual e perspectivas. São Paulo: Epusp, 1993b. p. 59-65.

BEANLANDS, G. E.; P. N. DUINKER An ecological framework for environmental impact assessment in Canada. Halifax: Institute for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University, 1983.

BECKER, D. R. et al. A comparison of a technical and a participatory application of social impact assessment. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 22, n. 3, p. 177-189, 2004.

BEDÊ, L. C. et al. Manual para mapeamento de biótopos no Brasil. 2. ed. Belo Horizonte: Fundação Alexander Brandt, 1997.

BELLINGER, E. et al. Environmental assessment in countries in transition. Budapest: CEU Press, 2000.

BENSON, J. F. What is the alternative? impact assessment tools and sustainable planning. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 21, n. 4, p. 261-266, 2003.

BERGER, A. R. The geoindicator concept and its application: an introduction. In: BERGER, A.R.; IAMS, W.J. (Orgs.), Geoindicators. Rotterdam, Balkema, 1996. p. 1-14.

BINGHAM, G. Must the Courts resolve all our conflicts? Phi Kappa Phi Journal, p. 20-21, winter 1989.

BINGHAM, G.; LANDSTAFF, L. M. Alternative dispute resolution in the NEPA process. In: CLARCK, R.; CANTER, L. (Orgs.). Environmental policy and NEPA. Past, present and future. Boca Raton: St. Lucie Press, 1997. p. 277-288.

BIRLEY, M. Health impact assessment: principles and practice. London: Earthscan, 2011.

BISSET, R. A critical survey of methods for environmental impact assessment. In: O’RIORDAN, T.; TURNER, R.K. (Orgs.). An annotated reader in environmental planning and management. Oxford: Pergamon, 1984a. p. 168-186.

______. Post development audits to investigate the accuracy of environmental impact predictions. Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik, v. 7, p. 463-484, 1984b.

______. Development of EIA methods. In: WATHERN, P. (Org.). Environmental impact assessment: theory and practice. London: Unwin Hyman, 1988. p. 47-61.

BITAR, O. Y. et al. Indicadores geológico-geotécnicos na recuperação ambiental de áreas degradadas em regiões urbanas. In: VIII CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE GEOLOGIA. Poços de Caldas, v. 2, 1993. Anais… p. 177-183.

BLOCK, M. R. Identifying environmental aspects and impacts. Milwaukee: Quality Press, 1999.

BOFFEY, P. M. Teton dam verdict: a foul-up by the engineers. Science, v. 195, p. 270-272, 1977.

BOJÓRQUEZ-TAPIA, L. A.; GARCÍA, O. An approach for evaluating EIAs – deficiencies of EIA in Mexico. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 18, p. 218-240, 1998.

BOM, A. E. R.; MORAIS, N. A. Normas técnicas para apresentação de mapas em estudos de impactos ambientais. In: JUCHEM, P. A. (Org.). Manual de avaliação de impactos ambientais. 2. ed. Curitiba: Instituto Ambiental do Paraná/Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit, 1993. p. 3217-3221.

BOND, A.; MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A.; POPE, J. Sustainability assessment: the state of the art. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 30, n.1, p. 53-62, 2012.

BOOTHROYD, P. Policy assessment. In: VANCLAY, F.; BRONSTEIN, D. A. (Orgs.). Environmental and social impact assessment. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1995. p. 83-126.

BOOTHROYD, P. An overview of the issues raised at the international conference on social impact assessment, Vancouver, October 24-27, 1982, não publicado.

BOSI, A. A dialética da colonização. 2. ed. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1992.

BOWONDER, B.; KASPERSON, J. X.; KASPERSON, R. E. Avoiding future Bhopals. Environment, v. 27, n. 7, p. 6-13, 31, 1985.

BRANCO, G. M. et al. Impacto do sistema Anchieta-Imigrantes sobre a qualidade do ar e modelagem estatística para a intervenção e gerenciamento da sua operação. In: III CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE CONCESSÕES DE RODOVIAS, Gramado, 2003.

BREGMAN, J. I.; MACKENTHUN, K. M. Environmental impact statements. Boca Raton: Lewis, 1992.

BUCHER, E. H.; HUZSAR, P. C. Critical environmental costs of the Paraguai-Paraná waterway project in South America. Ecological economics, v. 15, p. 3-9, 1995.

BUCHER, E. H. et al. Hidrovia: uma análise ambiental inicial da via fluvial Paraguai-Paraná. Buenos Aires: Manomet, Humedales para las Américas, 1994.

BUCKLEY, R. Auditing the precision and accuracy of environmental impact predictions in Australia. Environmental monitoring and assessment, v. 18, p. 1-23, 1991a.

______. How accurate are environmental impact predictions? Ambio v. 20, n. 3-4, p. 161-162, 1991b.

BURDGE, R. J. Social impact assessment: definition and historical trends. In: BURDGE, R. J. (Org.). The concepts, process and methods of social impact assessment. Middleton: Social Ecology Press, 2004. p. 1-11.

BURDGE, R. J.; VANCLAY, F. Social impact assessment. In: VANCLAY, F.; BRONSTEIN, D. A. (Orgs.), Environmental and social impact assessment. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1995. p. 31-65.

BYRON, H. Biodiversity and environmental impact assessment: a good practice guide for road schemes. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds/WWF-UK/English Nature/The Wildlife Trust, Sandy, 2000.

CAIRNS Jr., J. Restoration, reclamation, and regeneration of degraded or destroyed ecosystems. In: SOULÉ, M. E. (Org.). Conservation biology. Sunderland: Sinauer, 1986. p. 465-484.

CALDARELLI, S. B. Levantamento arqueológico em planejamento ambiental. Revista do museu de arqueologia e etnologia, Suplemento 3, p. 347-369, 1999.

CALDARELLI, S. B.; SANTOS, M. C. M. M. Arqueologia de contrato no Brasil. Revista USP, n. 44, p. 52-73, 2000.

CALDWELL, L. The environmental impact statement: a misused tool. In: JAIN, R. K.; HUTCHINGS, B. L. (Orgs.). Environmental impact analysis. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press, 1977. p. 11-25.

______. 20 years with NEPA indicates the need. Environment, v. 31, n. 10, p. 6-28, 1989.

CANELAS, L.; ALMANSA, P.; MERCHAN, M.; CIFUENTES, P. Quality of environmental impact statements in Portugal and Spain. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 25, p. 217-225, 2005.

CANTER, L. Environmental impact assessment. 2. ed. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill, 1996.

CANTER, L. Cumulative effects assessment. In: PETTS, J (Org.), Handbook of environmental impact assessment: process, methods and potential, vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999, p. 405-440.

CANTER, L.; ROSS, B. State of practice of cumulative effects assessment and management: the good, the bad and the ugly. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 28, n. 4, p. 261-268, 2010.

CARDOSO, F. H; MULLER, G. Amazônia: expansão do capitalismo. 2a. ed. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1978.

CARPENTER, R. A. Risk assessment. In: VANCLAY, F.; BRONSTEIN, D.A. (Orgs.), Environmental and social impact assessment. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1995. p. 193-219.

CARRASCO, L.E.; BLANK, G.; SILLS, E.O. Characterizing environmental impact statements for road projects in North Carolina, USA. Impact assessment and project appraisal v. 24, n. 1, p. 65-76, 2006.

CARROLL, B.; TURPIN, T. Environmental impact assessment handbook: a practical guide for planners, developers and communities. London: Thomas Telford, 2a. ed., 2009.

CARVALHO, J.; ALMEIDA, R. O. P. O.; BASTOS, R. L. Análise crítica do processo de avaliação de impacto ambiental da UHE Piraju. Trabalho da disciplina PMI-5705 Estudos Comparativos em Avaliação de Impacto Ambiental: Canadá, França, Brasil. Escola Politécnica da USP, 1998. (Inédito)

CASHMORE, M.; CHRISTOPHILOPOULOS, E.; COBB, D. An evaluation of the quality of environmental impact statements in Thessaloniki, Greece. Journal of environmental assessment policy and management, v. 4, n. 4, p.371-395, 2002.

CASSETI, W. Ambiente e apropriação do relevo. 2. ed. São Paulo: Contexto, 1995.

CEBRAC/ICV/WWF. Hidrovia Paraguai-Paraná. Quem paga a conta? Brasília: 1994.

CEIA, COMMISSION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Annual report 2001. Utrecht: Commission for Environmental Impact Assessment, 2002a.

______. Environmental impact assessment in the Netherlands. Views from the Commission for EIA in 2002. Utrecht: Commission for Environmental Impact Assessment, 2002b.

CEMAT. Relatório de responsabilidade socioambiental 2011. 2011.

CEQ, Council on Environmental Quality. Considering cumulative effects under the National Environmental Policy Act. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, 1997.

CETESB, COMPANHIA ESTADUAL DE TECNOLOGIA DE SANEAMENTO AMBIENTAL. Baixada Santista. Carta do meio ambiente e de sua dinâmica. São Paulo: Cetesb, 1985 + carta.

______. Manual de gerenciamento de áreas contaminadas. 2. ed. São Paulo: Cetesb, 2001.

______. Norma Técnica P 2461. Manual de orientação para a elaboração de estudos de análise de riscos, Diário Oficial do Estado de São Paulo v. 113, n. 156, Seção I, 2003. p. 34-43.

CLARK, R. NEPA: the rational approach to change. In: CLARK, R.; CANTER, L. (Orgs.). Environmental policy and NEPA. Past, present and future. Boca Raton: St. Lucie Press, 1997. p. 15-23.

CLOQUELL-BALLESTER, V. A. et al. Indicators validation for the improvement of environmental and social impact quantitative assessment. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 26, p. 79-105, 2006.

COLBORN, T. et al. Natural gas operations from a public health perspective. Human and ecological risk assessment, v. 17, p. 1039-1056, 2011.

COMITÉ DE LA BAIE JAMES SUR LE MERCURE. Rapport d’activités 1988-1987. Montreal: 1988.

______. Rapport d’activités 1990-1991. Montreal: 1992.

COOPER, L.M.; SHEATE, W. R. Cumulative effects assessment: a review of UK environmental impact statements. Environmental impact assessment review, n. 22, p. 415-439, 2002.

COPPEDÊ JR., A.; BOECHAT, E.C. Avaliação das interferências ambientais da mineração nos recursos hídricos na bacia do Alto Rio das Velhas. In: X CONG. BRAS. GEOLOGIA DE ENGENHARIA, Ouro Preto, 2002. Anais… CD-ROM.

COSTA, R.M.; SÁNCHEZ, L.E. Avaliação do desempenho ambiental de obras de recuperação de rodovias. REM: Revista Escola de Minas, v. 63, n. 2, p. 247-254, 2010.

COSTANZA, R. Ecological economics: the science and management of sustainability. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.

COSTANZA, R. et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological economics, v. 25, n. 1, p. 3-15, 1997.

COUCEIRO, S.R.M.; FONSECA, C.P. Sedimentos reduzem biodiversidade. Ciência hoje, v. 44, n. 262, p. 60-63, 2009.

COUCH, W. J. L’Évaluation environnementale au Canada: Sommaire des pratiques actuelles. Conseil Canadien des Ministres des Resources et de l´Environnement, 1988.

CPRM, COMPANHIA DE PESQUISA DE RECURSOS MINERAIS. Contribuição da CPRM para os planos diretores municipais. Orientações básicas. Brasília: CPRM, 1991.

CREPALDI, C. Análise de parâmetros de monitoramento ambiental da mina do Trevo Siderópolis. São Paulo: Escola Politécnica da USP, Dissertação de Mestrado, 2003.

CRIÉ, H. Tchernobyl: une catastrophe sans precédent. La Recherche, supplement, n. 212, p. 48-49, 1989.

CROWFOOT, J. E.; WONDOLLECK, J. M. Citizen organizations and environmental conflict. In: CROWFOOT, J. E.; WONDOLLECK, J. M. (Orgs.). Environmental disputes: community involvement in conflict resolution. Washington: Island Press, 1990. p. 1-16.

CRUMP, A. Dictionary of environment and development. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993.

CULHANE, P. J. Decision making by voluminous speculation: the contents and accuracy of U.S. environmental impact statements. In: SADLER, B. (Org.). Audit and evaluation in environmental assessment and management: canadian and international experience. Ottawa: Environment Canada, 1985. v. II, p. 357-378.

CULHANE, P. J. et al. Forecasts and environmental decision-making. The content and accuracy of environmental impact statements. Boulder: Westview Press, 1987.

CUPEI, J. Estudo de impacto ambiental (UVP) e processos de decisão. In: MÜLLER-PLANTENBERG, C.; AB’SÁBER, A. N. (Orgs.). Previsão de impactos. São Paulo: Edusp, 1994. p. 419-437.

CUPERUS, R. et al. Ecological compensation in dutch highway planning. Environmental management, n. 27, v. 1, p. 75-89, 2001.

DAWSON, D. G. Roads and habitat corridors for animals and plants. In: SHERWOOD, B.; CUTLER, D.; BURTON, J. A. (Orgs.). Wildlife and roads: the ecological impact. London: Imperial College Press, 2002. p. 185-198.

DE BROISSIA, M. Selected mathematical models in environmental impact assessment in Canada. Hull: Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council, 1986.

DE GROOT, R. S. Functions of Nature: Evaluation of nature in environmental planning, Management and Decision-Making. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff, 1992.

DE JONGH, P. Uncertainty in EIA. In: WATHERN, P. (Org.). Environmental impact assessment: theory and practice. London: Unwin Hyman, 1988. p. 62-84.

DE PAULA, M.B. et al. Effects of artificial flooding for hydroelectric development on the population of Mansonia humeralis (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Paraná River, São Paulo, Brazil. Journal of tropical medicine, v. 29, Article ID 598789, 6 p., 2012.

DEAN, W. A ferro e fogo. A história e a devastação da mata atlântica brasileira. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1997.

DEE, N. et al. An environmental evaluation system for water resource planning. Water resource research, v. 9, n. 3, p. 523-535, 1973.

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS Checklist of environmental characteristics. Pretoria: Integrated Environmental Management Guideline Series, Guideline Document 5, 1992.

DGOTDU, Direção General do Ordenamento do Território e Desenvolvimento Urbano. Servidões e restrições de utilidade pública. Lisboa, 2011.

DIAS, E. G. C. S. Avaliação de impacto ambiental de projetos de mineração no Estado de São Paulo; a etapa de acompanhamento. São Paulo: Escola Politécnica da USP, tese de doutorado, 2001.

DIAS, E. G. C. S.; SÁNCHEZ, L. E. Deficiências na implementação de projetos submetidos à avaliação de impacto ambiental no Estado de São Paulo. Revista de direito ambiental, v. 6, n. 23, p. 163-204, 2001.

______. A participação pública versus os procedimentos burocráticos no processo de avaliação de impactos ambientais de uma pedreira. Revista de administração pública, v. 33, n. 4, p. 81-91, 1999.

DIEGUES, A. C. O mito moderno da natureza intocada. São Paulo: Nupaub/USP, 1994.

DONNELY, C. R.; MORGENROTH, M. Risky business. International water power & dam construction, May 2005, p. 16-23.

DORNEY, R. S. The professional practice of environmental management. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989.

DOUGHERTY, T.C.; HALL, A.W. Environmental impact assessment of irrigation and drainage projects. Roma: FAO, 1995.

DREYER-EIMBCKE, O. O descobrimento da terra: história e histórias da aventura cartográfica. São Paulo: Melhoramentos/Edusp, 1992.

DREYFUS, D. A.; INGRAM, H. M. The national environmental policy act: a view of intent and practice. Natural resources journal, v.16, n. 2, p. 243-262, 1976.

DUBLER, J. R.; GRIGG, N. S. Dam safety policy for spillway design floods. Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, v. 122, n. 4, p. 163-169, 1996.

DUINKER, P. N.; BEANLANDS, G. E. The significance of environmental impacts: an exploration of the concept. Environmental management, v. 10, n. 1, p. 1-10, 1986.

ECCLESTON, C. H. Environmental impact statement: a comprehensive guide to project and strategic planning. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.

ECCLESTON, C. H. Environmental impact assessment: a guide to best professional practices. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2011.

ECO, U. Come si fa una tesi di laurea. 10. ed. Milano: Tascabili Bompiani, 1986.

EIDSVIK, H. K. Involving the public in park planning: Canada. Parks v. 3, n. 1, p. 3-5, 1978.

ELETROBRÁS. Manual de estudos de efeitos ambientais dos sistemas elétricos, 1986.

ELLIS, D. Environments at risk. Case histories of impact assessment. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989.

ELSOM, D. M. Air quality and climate. In: MORRIS, P.; THERIVEL, R. (Orgs.). Methods of environmental impact assessment. 2. ed. London: Spon Press, 2001. p.145-169.

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (AUSTRALIA). Overview of best practice environmental management in mining. Barton, 1995a.

______. Community consultation and involvement. Best practice in environmental management in mining. Barton, 1995b.

ERICKSON, P. A. A practical guide to environmental impact assessment. San Diego: Academic Press, 1994.

ERL, ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES LTD. Handling uncertainty in environmental impact assessment. Gravenhage: Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer/Ministerie van Landbouw en Visserj, 1985.

ESPINOZA, G.; ALZINA, V. Review of environmental impact assessment in selected countries of Latin America and the Caribbean: methodology, results and trends. Santiago: Inter-American Development Bank, Center for Development Studies, 2001.

ESTEVES, A.M.; FRANKS, D.; VANCLAY, F. Social impact assessment: the state-of-the-art. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 30, n.1, p. 34-42, 2012.

ESTEVES, F. A.; BOZELLI, R. L.; ROLAND, F. Lago Batata: um laboratório de limnologia tropical. Ciência hoje, n. 11, n. 64, p. 26-33, 1990.

ESTEVES, O. Résistances Populaires. Le Monde Diplomatique, p.16-17, jan. 2006.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Guidance on EIA. EIS review. Directorate General for Environment, Nuclear Safety and Civil Protection, 1994.

______. Guidance on EIA — Scoping. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2001a.

______. Environmental impact assessment review. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2001b.

EVALUATION COMMITTEE. Towards a sustainable system of environmental impact assessment. Second advisory report on the EIA regulations contained in the environmental management act, Summary. The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, 1996.

ERICKSEN, P.; WOODLEY, E. Using multiple knowledge systems: benefits and challenges. In: CAPISTRANO, D. et al. (Org.), Ecosystems and human well-being: multiscale assessments, volume 4. Washington: Island Press, 2005, p. 85-117.

FAIRFAX, S. K. A disaster in the environmental movement. Science, v. 199, p. 743-748, 1978.

FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization/DVWK, Deutscher Verband für Wasserwirtschaft und Kulturbau. Fish passes: Design, Dimension and Monitoring. Roma: FAO, 2002.

FARIA, A. A. C. A Contestação do relatório ambiental preliminar — RAP como instrumento de avaliação de impacto ambiental. In: GOLDENSTEIN, S. et al. Avaliação de impacto ambiental. São Paulo: Secretaria do Meio Ambiente, Série Documentos Ambientais, 1998. p. 31-34.

FEARNSIDE, P. Brazil´s Balbina dam: environment versus the legacy of the pharaohs in Amazonia. Environmental management, v. 13, n. 4, p. 401-423, 1989.

FEARNSIDE, P. Social impacts of Brazil’s Tucuruí dam. Environmental management, v. 24, n. 4, p. 483-495, 1999.

FEININGER, A. La nueva técnica fotográfica. Barcelona: Editorial Hispano Europea, 1972.

FELDMANN, F. Tratados e organizações internacionais em matéria de meio ambiente. 2. ed. São Paulo: Secretaria do Meio Ambiente, 1997.

FERC, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Silver lake fuse plug activation, dead river project, P-10855, Summary of Conclusions, 4/13/04. Disponível em www.ferc.org, acesso em 24 de setembro de 2006.

FERNÁNDEZ, H.D. Plan estratégico de comunicación (PEC) para la industria minera argentina. Rio de Janeiro: Cetem, 2006.

FERNÁNDEZ-VÍTORA, V. C. Guía metodológica para la evaluación del impacto ambiental. 4. ed. Madrid: Mundi-Prensa, 2010.

FERRER, J. T. V. Audiências públicas realizadas no processo de licenciamento e avaliação de impacto ambiental no Estado de São Paulo. Avaliação de impactos, n. 4, v. 1, p. 79-100, 1998.

FISCHER, F. Risk assessment and environmental crisis: towards an integration of science and participation. Industrial crisis quarterly, n. 5, p. 113-132, 1991.

FIX, M. São Paulo cidade global: fundamentos financeiros de uma miragem. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2007.

FONTES Jr.; H. M.; FERNANDEZ, D. R.; FIORINI, A. S. New channel provides fish passage at Itaipu Dam. HRW Hydro Review Worldwide, July 2004, p. 18-19.

FORD, A.T.; CLEVENGER, A.P.; RETTIE, K. The Banff wildlife crossing project: an international public-private partnership. In: BECKMANN, J.P.; CLEVERNGER, A.P.; HUIJSER, M.P.; HILTY, J.A. (Orgs.). Safe passages: highways, wildlife, and habitat connectivity. Washington: Island Press, 2010, p., 157-172.

FORNASARI FILHO, N. et al. Alterações no meio físico decorrentes de obras de engenharia. Boletim 61, São Paulo: Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnológicas, 1992.

FORSBERG, B. et al. Development and erosion in the brazilian Amazon: a geochronological case study. GeoJournal, n. 19, v. 4, p. 399, 402-405, 1989.

FUGGLE, R. Integrated environmental management. In: FUGGLE, R.; RABIE, M. A. (Orgs.). Environmental management in South Africa. Cape Town: Juta & Co., 1992. p. 748-761.

FUGGLE, R. et al. Guidelines for scoping. Pretoria: Department of Environmental Affairs, 1992.

FURTADO, C. O Mito do desenvolvimento econômico. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1974.

______. O Brasil pós-“milagre”. 7. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1982.

GALLARDO, A. L. C. F. Análise das práticas de gestão ambiental da construção da pista descendente da rodovia dos Imigrantes. Escola Politécnica da USP, tese de doutorado, 2004.

GALLARDO, A. L. C. F.; SÁNCHEZ, L. E. Follow-up of a road building scheme in a fragile environment. Environmental impact assessment review, n. 24, v. 2, p. 47-58, 2004.

GALVES, M.L.; HACHICH, W. Análise de decisões em geotecnia ambiental: exemplo de aplicação à escolha do traçado de rodovias Solos e rochas, v. 23, n.2, p. 93-111, 2000.

GANDOLFI, N. A cartografia geotécnica no planejamento do uso e ocupação do solo. In: CHASSOT, A.; CAMPOS, H. (Orgs.). Ciências da terra e meio ambiente: diálogos para (inter)ações no planeta. São Leopoldo: Editora Unisinos, 1999, p. 113-127.

GARCEZ, L. N. Efeitos de grandes barragens no meio ambiente e no desenvolvimento regional. Inter-Fácies – Escritos e Documentos, n. 64, p. 1-21, 1981. (Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas, Unesp, São José do Rio Preto.)

GARIS, Y. What is the alternative? Response to Benson. Impact assessment and project appraisal, n. 21, v. 4, p. 272, 2003.

GASPAR, A.L.S. et al. Análise crítica de estudo ambiental. Usina Hidrelétrica de Irapé. Trabalho de disciplina Avaliação de Impacto Ambiental I, Programa de Educação Continuada em Engenharia, Escola Politécnica da USP, 2005.

GEORGE, C. Environmental monitoring, management and auditing. In: LEE, N.; GEORGE, C. (Orgs.). Environmental assessment in developing and transitional countries. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2000. p. 177-193.

GHK. Collection of information and data to support the impact assessment study of the review of the EIA Directive. A study for DG Environment. London: GHK, 2010.

GIBSON, R. et al. Sustainability assessment: criteria, process and applications. London: Earthscan, 2005.

GILLETTE, R. Trans-Alaska pipeline: impact study receives bad reviews. Science, v. 171, p. 1130-1132, 1971.

GIMENES, C.E.R. A pesquisa da cultura imaterial na AIA: reflexão sobre o EIA da hidrelétrica Santa Isabel. In: 2ª Conferência da REDE de Língua Portuguesa de Avaliação de Impactos/ 1o Congresso Brasileiro de Avaliação de Impactos, 1o. São Paulo, 2012.

GILPIN, A. Environmental impact assessment. Cambridge University Press, 1995.

GLASSON, J.; SALVADOR, N. N. B. EIA in Brazil: a procedures-practice gap. A comparative study with reference to the European Union, and especially the UK. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 20, p. 191-225, 2000.

GLASSON, J.; THERIVEL, R.; CHADWICK, A. Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment. 2. ed. London: UCL Press, 1999.

GLASSON, J.; THERIVEL, R.; WESTON, J; WILSON, E; FROST, R. EIA - Learning from experience: changes in the quality of environmental impact statements for UK planning projects. Journal of environmental planning and management, v. 40, n. 4, p. 451-464, 1997.

GODARD. O. Aspects institutionnels de la gestion intégrée des ressources naturelles et de l´environnement. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l´Homme, 1980.

______. L’Environnement, une polysémie sous-exploitée. In: JOLLIVET, M. (Org.). Sciences de la nature, sciences de la société: les passeus de frontières. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 1992. p. 337-344.

GODELIER, M. Rationalité & irrationalité en économie. Paris: Maspero, 1983. v. I.

GODET, M. Méthode des scénarios. Futuribles, n. 71, p. 110-120, 1983a.

______. Sept idées-clés. Futuribles, n. 71, p. 5-9, 1983b.

GONTIER, M.; BALFORS, B.; MÖRTBERG, U. Biodiversity in environmental impact assessment — current practice and tools for prediction. Environmental impact assessment review, n. 26, p. 268-286, 2006.

GOODLAND, R. Social and environmental assessment to promote sustainability. An informal view. The World Bank environment department papers, n. 74, p. 1-36, 2000.

GOODLAND, R.; IRWIN, H. A selva amazônia: do inferno verde ao deserto vermelho? São Paulo/Belo Horizonte: Edusp/Itatiaia, 1975.

GOODLAND, R.; MERCIER, J. R. The evolution of environmental assessment in the World Bank: from “approval” to results. The World Bank Environment Department papers, n. 67, 1999.

GOODLAND, R.; WEBB, M. The management of cultural property in World-Bank assisted projects. Archaeological, historical, religious, and natural unique sites. World Bank technical paper, n. 62, p. 1-102, 1987.

GORCZYNSKI, D.M. Insider’s guide to environmental negotiation. Chelsea: Lewis, 1991.

GOUTAL, N. The Malpasset dam failure: an overview and test case definition. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Cadam Workshop, Zaragoza, 1999.

GOUVÊA, Y. M. G. Situação atual e perspectivas da avaliação de impacto ambiental no Brasil. In: SÁNCHEZ, L. E. (Org.), Avaliação de impacto ambiental: situação atual e perspectivas. São Paulo: Epusp, 1993. p. 147-151.

______. A interpretação do artigo 2o da Resolução Conama 01/86. In: GOLDENSTEIN, S. et al. Avaliação de impacto ambiental. São Paulo: Secretaria do Meio Ambiente, 1998. p. 11-23.

GRAY, I.; EDWARDS-JONES, G. A review of environmental statements in the British forest sector. Impact assessment and project appraisal v. 21, n. 4, p. 303-312, 2003.

GREENBERG, M.R. The environmental impact statement after two generations. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.

GRIMA, A. P. et. al. Risk management and EIA: research needs and opportunities. Hull: Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council, 1986.

GUIMARÃES, R. P. The ecopolitics of development in the third world: politics and environment in Brazil. Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner, 1991.

GUTMANN, A.; THOMPSON, D. Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1996.

HABERMAS, J. Mudança estrutural da esfera pública: investigações quanto a uma categoria da sociedade burguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 1984.

______. Direito e democracia: entre facticidade e validade. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 1997. v. II.

HAMMOND, A. et al. Environmental indicators: a systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development. Washington: World Resources Institute, 1995.

HARRIS-ROXAS, B. et al. Health impact assessment: the state-of-the-art. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 30, n.1, p. 43-52, 2012.

HARRISON, E. B. Environmental communication and public relations handbook. 2. ed. Government Institutes, Rockville: 1992.

HÉBRARD, S. L’étude d’impact sur l’environement: révolution ou evolution dans l’aménagement du territoire? Paris: Univ. Paris II, tese de doutorado, 1982.

HEGMANN, G. et al. Cumulative effects assessment practitioner’s guide. Hull: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, 1999.

HEINK, U.; KOWARIK, I. What are indicators? On the definition of indicators in ecology and environmental planning. Ecological indicators, v. 10, p. 584-593, 2010.

HERRERA, A. The generation of technologies in rural areas. World development, v. 9, p. 21-35, 1981.

HICHAO, D.; RUSHU, W. Managing the Environment. International water power & dam construction, March 2006. p. 16-19.

HILDYARD, N. Adios Amazonia? a report from the Altimira gathering. The Ecologist, v. 19, n. 2, p. 53-62, 1989.

HIRATA, R. C. A. Os recursos hídricos subterrâneos e as novas exigências ambientais. Revista do instituto geológico, v. 14, n. 1, p. 39-62, 1993.

HKEPD, HONG KONG ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DEPARTMENT. Generic environmental monitoring and audit manual. Hong Kong: HKEPD, 1996.

______. Technical memorandum on environmental impact assessment process. Hong Kong: HKEPD, 1997.

HODSON, M. J.; STAPLETON, C.; EMBERTON; R. Soils, geology and geomorphology. In: MORRIS, P.; THERIVEL, R. (Orgs.), Methods of environmental impact assessment. 2. ed. London: Spon Press, 2001. p. 170-196.

HÖLKER, F. et al. Light pollution as a biodiversity threat. Trends in ecology and evolution v. 25, n. 12, p. 681-682, 2010a.

HÖLKER, F. et al. The dark side of light: a transdisciplinary research agenda for light pollution policy. Ecology and society v. 15, n. 4: 13, 2010b.

HOLLICK, M. Environmental impact assessment: an international evaluation. Environmental management v. 10, n. 2, p. 157-178, 1986.

HOLLING, C. S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual review of ecology and systematics, v. 4, p. 1-23, 1973.

HORBERRY, J. Status and application of environmental impact assessment (EIA) for development. In: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT. Feldafing: Deutsche Stiftung für Internationale Entwicklung/United Nations Environment Program, 1984. Proceedings p. 269-377.

______. Fitting USAID to the environmental assessment provisions of NEPA. In: WATHERN, P. (Org.). Environmental impact assessment: theory and practice. London: Unwin Hyman, 1988. p. 286-299.

HYDRO-QUÉBEC. Méthode d’ évaluation environnementale. Lignes e postes. Montreal, Hydro-Québec, 1990.

______. Matrice des impacts potentiels et mesures d’atténuation. Méthode d’évaluation environnementale lignes et postes, Techniques et Outils 1 et 7, revision. Montreal: Hydro-Québec, 1994.

IAIA, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Principles of environmental impact assessment best practice. Fargo: IAIA, Special Publication v. 1, 1999.

IBAMA, INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DO MEIO AMBIENTE E DOS RECURSOS NATURAIS RENOVÁVEIS. Avaliação de impacto ambiental: agentes sociais, procedimentos e ferramentas. Brasília: Ibama, 1995.

______. GEO Brasil 2002, Perspectivas do meio ambiente no Brasil. Brasília: Ibama, 2002.

IBGE, INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA. Manual técnico da vegetação brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 1992.

______. Manual de normas, especificações e procedimentos técnicos para a carta internacional do mundo ao milionésimo – CIM 1:1.000.000. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 1993.

IBRAHIM, M. M. C. et al. Poliduto São Paulo–Brasília/Osbra. In: LIMA, A. L. B. R.; TEIXEIRA, H. R.; SÁNCHEZ, L. E. (Orgs.). A efetividade da avaliação de impacto ambiental no Estado de São Paulo: uma análise a partir de estudos de caso. São Paulo: Secretaria do Meio Ambiente, 1995. p. 35-40.

ICOLD, INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON LARGE DAMS. Tailings dams: risk of dangerous occurrences. Paris: ICOLD, 2001.

ICMM, INTERNACIONAL COUNCIL ON MINING AND METALS. Good practice guidance on health impact assessment. London: ICMM, 2010.

IEG, INDEPENDENT EVALUATION GROUP. Environmental sustainability: an evaluation of World Bank Group support. Washington: World Bank, 2008.

IFC, INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORPORATION. Compliance Advisor Ombudsman review of IFC’s Safeguard Policies. Washington: World Bank, 2003a.

IFC, INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORPORATION. Addressing the social dimensions of private sector projects. Good Practice Note 3, p. 1-28, 2003b.

IFC, INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORPORATION. IFC performance standards on environmental and social sustainability. Washington: World Bank, 2012.

IG/CETESB/DAEE, Instituto Geológico/Companhia de Tecnologia de Saneamento Ambiental/Departamento de Águas e Energia Elétrica. Mapeamento da vulnerabilidade e risco de poluição das águas subterrâneas no Estado de São Paulo, v. 1. São Paulo: Instituto Geológico, 1997.

IIED/WBCSD, INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT/ WORLD BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Breaking new ground. Mining, minerals and sustainable development, The Report of the MMSD Project. London: Earthscan, 2002.

IPIECA, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF OIL & GAS PRODUCERS. A guide to health impact assessment in oil and gas industry. London: IPIECA, 2011.

IPT/ CEMPRE, INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS TECNOLÓGICAS DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO/ COMPROMISSO EMPRESARIAL PELA RECICLAGEM. Lixo municipal: manual de gerenciamento integrado. 2. ed. São Paulo: IPT, 2000.

ISA, INSTITUTO SOCIOAMBIENTAL. Almanaque Brasil socioambiental. São Paulo: ISA, 2004.

ITGE, INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO GEOMINERO DE ESPAÑA. El patrimônio geológico. Madrid: ITGE, s/d.

JABLONSKI, S.; AZEVEDO, A. F.; MOREIRA, L. H. A. Fisheries and conflicts in Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Brazilian archives of biology and technology, v. 49, n. 1, p. 79-91, 2006.

JALAVA, K.; PASANEN, S.; SAALASTI, M.; KUITUNEN, M. Quality of environmental impact assessment: Finnish EISs and the opinion of EIA professionals. Impact assessment and project appraisal v. 28, n.1, p. 15-27, 2010.

JOÃO, E. How Scale affects environmental impact assessment. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 22, p. 289-310, 2002.

JOÃO, E.; VANCLAY, F.; den BROEDER, L. Emphasizing enhancement in all forms of impact assessment: introduction to a special issue. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 29, n.3, p. 170-180, 2011.

JOHNSON, D. L. et al Meanings of environmental terms. Journal of environmental quality, n. 26, p. 581-589, 1997.

JONES, S. A.; MASON, T. W. Role of impact assessment for strategic environmental management at firm level. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 19, n. 3, p. 175-185, 2002.

JORGE, J. Tietê: o rio que a cidade perdeu. São Paulo: Alameda, 2006.

JOURNAUX, A. (Org.) Cartographie integrée de l´environnement: un outil pour la recherche et pour l´aménagement. Notes Techniques du MAB. Paris: Unesco, 1985, 55p + 8 cartas.

KABIR, S.M.Z.; MOMTAZ, S. The quality of environmental impact statement and environmental impact assessment practice in Bangladesh. Impact assessment and project appraisal v. 30, n. 2, p. 94-98, 2012.

KASPERSON, R. E. et al. The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk analysis v. 8, n. 2, p. 177-187, 1988.

KATES, R. W. Risk assessment of environmental hazard. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1978.

KENNEDY, W. V. The West German experience. In: O’RIORDAN, T.; SEWELL, W.R.D. (Orgs.). Project appraisal and policy review. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1981. p. 155-185.

______. U. S. and Canadian experience with environmental impact assessment: relevance for the European Community? Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik, v. 7, p. 339-366, 1984.

______. Environmental impact assessment and bilateral development aid: an overview. In: WATHERN, P. (Org.). Environmental impact assessment: theory and practice. London: Unwin Hyman, 1988. p. 272-285.

KENNET, S. A. Cumulative effects assessment and the Cheviot Project: what´s wrong with this picture? Resources 68, p. 1-7, 1999.

______. The future for cumulative effects management: beyond the environmental assessment paradigm. Resources 69, p. 1-7, 2000.

KING, T. F. How the archeologists stole culture: a gap in american environmental impact assessment practice and how to fill it. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 18, n. 2, p. 117-133, 1998.

KIPNIS, P. O Uso de modelos preditivos para diagnosticar recursos arqueológicos em áreas a serem afetadas por empreendimentos de impacto ambiental. In: CALDARELLI, S.B. (Org.). ATAS DO SIMPÓSIO SOBRE POLÍTICA NACIONAL DO MEIO AMBIENTE E PATRIMÔNIO CULTURAL. Goiânia, 1996, p. 34-40.

KOLLURU, R. V. Risk assessment and management. In: KOLLURU, R.V. (Org.). Environmental strategies handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993. p. 327-403.

KRAWETZ, N. Social impact assessment: an introductory handbook. Halifax/Jakarta: Environmental management in Indonesia Project, 1991.

KRIWOKEN, L. K.; ROOTES, D. Tourism on ice: environmental impact assessment of Antarctic tourism. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 18, n. 2, p. 138-150, 2000.

KUHN, T. S. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2. ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1970.

KÜLLER, M. L.; MACHADO, P. R. O acompanhamento ambiental na construção do gasoduto Bolívia-Brasil nos trechos III e IV. In: Rio Oil & Gas Conference. Instituto Brasileiro do Petróleo, 1998.

LAGADEC, P. La civilisation du risque: catastrophes tecnhnologiques et responsabilité sociale. Paris: Seuil, 1981.

______. Risques, crises et gouvernance: ruptures d’horizons, ruptures de paradigmes. Réalités industrielles — Annales des mines, maio 2003. p. 5-11.

LAGO, A.; PÁDUA, J. A. O que é ecologia. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1984.

LAMONTAGNE, S. L. Le patrimoine immatériel. méthodologie d´inventaire pour les savoires, les savoir-faire et les porteurs de traditions. Québec: Les Publications du Québec, 1994.

LANDIM, S.N.T.; SÁNCHEZ, L.E. The contents and scope of environmental impact statements: how do they evolve over time? Impact asssessment and project appraisal v. 30, no. 4, p. 217-228, 2012.

LANDSBERG, F. S. et al. Ecosystem services review for impact assessment: introduction and guide to scoping. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, 2011.

LAURANCE, W. F. et al. The Future of Brazilian Amazon. Science v. 291, n. 5503, p. 438-439, 2001a. (Também material suplementar disponível on line.)

______. Response [to J.P. Silveira]. Science, v. 292, p. 1652-1654, 2001b.

LAWRENCE, D.P. Impact significance determination - designing an approach. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 27, p. 730-754, 2007a.

______. Impact significance determination - back to basics. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 27, p. 755-769, 2007b.

______. Impact significance determination - pushing the boundaries. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 27, p. 770-788, 2007c.

LEDUC, G.; RAYMOND, M. L´évaluation des impacts environnementaux: un outil d’aide à la décision. Ste.-Foy: Multimondes, 2000.

LEE, N. Reviewing the quality of environmental assessments. In: LEE, N.; GEORGE, C. (Orgs.), Environmental assessment in developing and transitional countries. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2000a. p. 137-148.

______. Integrating appraisals and decision-making. In: LEE, N.; GEORGE, C. (Orgs.), Environmental assessment in developing and transitional countries. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2000b. p. 161-175.

LEE, N.; BROWN, D. Quality control in environmental assessment. Project appraisal v. 7, n, 1, p. 41-45, 1992.

LEE, N.; COLLEY, R.; BONDE, J. SIMPSON, J. Reviewing the quality of environmental statements. Department of Planning and Landscape, University of Manchester, Occasional Paper 55: 1-72, 1999.

LEE, N.; DANCEY, R. The quality of environmental impact statements in Ireland and the United Kingdom: a comparative analysis. Project appraisal v. 8, n. 1, p. 31-36, 1993.

LEIBOWITZ, S. C. et al. A synoptic approach to cumulative impact assessment. A proposed methodology. Washington: Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-92/167, 1992.

LEMOS, C. A. C. Ramos de Azevedo e seu escritório. São Paulo: Pini, 1993.

LEOPOLD, L. B. et al. A procedure for evaluating environmental impact. U.S. Geological Survey Circular, v. 645, Washington, 1971.

LIBANORI, A.; RODRIGUES, J. R. Avaliação de impacto ambiental no Estado de São Paulo. In: SÁNCHEZ, L. E. (Org.). Avaliação de impacto ambiental: situação atual e perspectivas. São Paulo: Epusp, 1993. p. 147-151.

LIBAULT, A. Geocartografia. São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional/Edusp, 1975.

LOFTIN, H. Environmental impact statements. Science v. 193, p. 248, 251, 1976.

LUTZEMBERGER, J. Fim do futuro? Manifesto ecológico brasileiro. Porto Alegre: Editora da URGS/Movimento, 1980.

______. The World Bank’s Polo Noroeste Project — a social and environmental catastrophe. The Ecologist, n. 15(1/2): 69-72, 1985.

MACHADO, P. A. L. Avaliação de impacto ambiental e direito ambiental no Brasil. In: SÁNCHEZ, L. E. (Org.). Avaliação de impacto ambiental: situação atual e perspectivas. São Paulo: Epusp, 1993. p. 49-57.

______. Direito ambiental brasileiro. 11a. ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2003.

MAGLIOCCA, A. Glossário de oceonografia. São Paulo: Nova Stella/ Edusp, 1987.

MANCUSO, R. C. Interesses difusos. Conceito e legitimação para agir. 4. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 1997.

MAO, W.; HILLS. P. Impacts of the economic-political reform on environmental impact assessment implementation in China. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 20, n. 2, p. 101-111, 2002.

MARCHIORO, G. B. et al. Avaliação dos impactos da exploração e produção de hidrocarbonetos no banco dos Abrolhos e adjacências. Megadiversidade, v. 1, n. 2, p. 225-310, 2005.

MARSHALL, R. Application of mitigation and its resolution within environmental impact assessment: an industrial perspective. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 19, n. 3, p. 195-204, 2001a.

______. Mitigation linkage: EIA follow-up through the application of EMP’s in transmission construction projects. In: IAIA’01, XXI ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR IMPACT ASSESSMENT, Cartagena. Fargo: IAIA, 2001b. [CD-ROM.]

______. Developing environmental management systems to deliver mitigation and protect the EIA process during follow-up. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 23, n. 3, p. 191-1962, 2002.

______. Environmental impact assessment follow-up and its benefits for industry. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 20, n. 4, 2005.

McCOLD, L. N.; SAULSBURY, J. W. Including past and present impacts in cumulative impact assessments. Environmental management, v. 20, n. 5, p. 767-776, 1996.

______. Defining the no-action alternative for national environmental policy act of continuing actions. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 18, p. 15-37, 1998.

MCCULLY, P. World rivers review, v. 10, n. 1, p. 1-16, 1999.

McDONALD, L. H. Evaluating and managing cumulative effects: process and constraints. Environmental management, v. 26, n. 3, p. 299-315, 2000.

McGUIRE, T. N. No ordinary highway: a thirty-year retrospective, Trans Canada Highway, Banff National Park of Canada. In: WEBER, C. (Org.). Rethinking Protected Areas in a Changing World: Proceeding of the 2011 George Wright Society Biennial Conference on Parks, Protected Areas, and Cultural Sites. Hancock, Michigan: The George Wright Society, 2011.

MEHTA, C.; BAIMAN, R. E PERSKY, J. The economic impact of Wal-Mart: an assessment of the Wal-Mart store proposed for Chicago´s West Side. Chicago, UIC Center for Urban Economic Development, 2004.

MELLO, P. J. C. Levantamento arqueológico, para fins de diagnóstico de bens pré-histórico, em áreas de implantação de empreendimentos hidrelétricos. In: CALDARELLI, S. B. (Org.). Atas do Simpósio sobre Política Nacional do Meio Ambiente e Patrimônio Cultural. Goiânia, 1996. p. 17-21.

MEMON, P. A. Devolution of environmental regulation: environmental impact assessment in Malaysia. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 18, n. 4, p. 283-293, 2000.

METZGER, J.P. Estrutura da paisagem: o uso adequado de métricas. In: CULLEN Jr., L.; RUDRAN, R.; VALLADARES-PÁDUA, C. Métodos de esdudos em biologia da conservação e manejo da vida silvestre. Curitiba: Editora UFPR, 2006, p. 423-453.

MILARÉ, E. A ação civil pública na nova ordem constitucional. São Paulo: Saraiva, 1990.

MILARÉ, E.; BENJAMIN, A. H. V. Estudo prévio de impacto ambiental. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 1993.

MILLISON, D.; HETTIGE, M. Financial advice. International water power & dam construction, October 2005. p. 40-42.

MINISTÈRE DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT Impact sur l’environnement. les mesures compensatoires. Neuilly-sur-Seine: Délégation à la Qualité de la Vie, 1985.

MINISTERIO DE MEDIO AMBIENTE Indicadores ambientales: una propuesta para España. Madrid: Dirección General de la Calidad y Evaluación Ambiental, 1996.

MINISTÉRIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE/IBAMA. Manual de normas e procedimentos para licenciamento ambiental no setor de extração mineral. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 2001.

MONMONIER, M. How to lie with maps. 2. ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996.

MONOSOWSKI, E. Brazil’s Tucuruí dam: development at environmental cost. In: GOLDSMITH, E.; HILDYARD, N. (Orgs.), The social and environmental effects of large dams. Camelford: Wadebridge Ecological Centre, 1986. v. 2, p. 191-198.

______. Políticas ambientais e desenvolvimento no Brasil. In: MONOSOWSKI, E. (Org.). Planejamento e gerenciamento ambiental. São Paulo: Cadernos Fundap 16, p. 15-24, 1989.

______. Lessons from the Tucuruí experience. Water power & dam construction, v. 42, n. 2, p. 29-34, 1990.

______. Avaliação de impacto ambiental na perspectiva do desenvolvimento sustentável. In: SÁNCHEZ, L. E. (Org.). Avaliação de impacto ambiental: situação atual e perspectivas. São Paulo: Epusp, 1993.p. 3-10.

______. O sertão vai virar mar. In: MÜLLER-PLANTENBERG, C.; AB’SÁBER, A. N. (Orgs.). Previsão de impactos. São Paulo: Edusp, 1994. p. 123-141.

MORÁN, E. F. A ecologia humana das populações da Amazônia. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1990.

MORAND-DEVILLER, J. Droit de l’Environnement. Paris: PUF, 1997,

MOREIRA, I. V. D. EIA in Latin America. In: WATHERN, P. (Org.). Environmental impact assessment: theory and practice. London: Unwin Hyman, 1988. p. 239-253.

______. Vocabulário básico de meio ambiente. Rio de Janeiro: Feema/Petrobrás, 1992.

______. A experiência brasileira em avaliação de impacto ambiental. In: SÁNCHEZ, L. E. (Org.). Avaliação de impacto ambiental: situação atual e perspectivas. São Paulo: Epusp, 1993a. p. 39-48.

____. Origem e síntese dos principais métodos de avaliação de impacto ambiental (AIA). In: JUCHEM, P. A. (Org.). Manual de avaliação de impactos ambientais. 2. ed. Curitiba, Instituto Ambiental do Paraná/Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit, 1993b.

MORGAN, R.K. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 30, n.1, p. 5-14, 2012.

MORIN, E.; KERN, A. B. Terre-Patrie. Paris: Seuil, 1993.

MORRIS, P.; EMBERTON, R. Ecology — overview and terrestrial systems In: MORRIS, P.; THERIVEL, R. (Orgs.), Methods of environmental impact assessment. 2. ed. London: Spon Press, 2001. p. 241-285.

MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A.; ARTS, J. (Orgs.), Assessing impact: handbook of EIA and SEA follow-up. London: Earthscan, 2004.

MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A.; BAILEY, J. Transparency in environmental impact assessment decision-making: recent developments in Western Australia. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 18, n. 4, p. 260-270, 2000.

MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A.; BAKER, J.; ARTS, J. Lessons from practice: towards successful follow-up. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 21, n. 1, p. 43-56, 2003.

MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A. et al. Roles and stakes in environmental assessment follow-up. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 19, n. 4, p. 289-296, 2001.

MPF, MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO FEDERAL. Deficiências em estudos de impacto ambiental: síntese de uma experiência. Brasília: Escola Superior do Ministério Público, 2004.

MUKAI, T. Direito ambiental sistematizado. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária, 1992.

MÜLLER-PLANTENBERG, C.; AB’SÁBER, A. N. (Orgs.). Previsão de impactos. São Paulo: Edusp, 1994.

MULLER-SALZBURG, L. Vajont catastrophe – a personal review. Engineering geology, v. 24, n. 1-4, p. 423-444, 1987.

MUNN, R. E. Environmental impact assessment: principles and procedures. SCOPE report 5. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons, 1975.

NAKASHIMA, D. J. Application of native knowledge in EIA: Inuit, Eiders and Hudson bay oil. Hull: Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council, 1990.

NASH, R. F. The rights of nature. A history of environmental ethics. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1989.

NAVEH, Z.; LIEBERMAN, A. Landscape ecology: theory and application. 2. ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994.

NCEA, Netherlands Commission for Environmental Assessment. Views and experiences 2012. Utrecht: MER, 2012.

NIEMEIJER, D.; DE GROOT, R.S. Framing environmental indicators: moving from causal chains to causal networks. Environment development and sustainability, v. 10, p. 89-106, 2008.

NEUMARK, D.; ZHANG, J. & CICARELLA, S. The Effects of Wal-Mart on Local Labor Market, Public Policy Institute of California, 2005, 54 p.

NOBLE, B.; STOREY, K. Towards increasing the utility of follow-up in Canadian EIA. In: IAIA’04, XIV ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR IMPACT ASSESSMENT, Vancouver. Fargo: IAIA, 2004. [CD-ROM.]

OECD, ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. Recommendation of the council on principles concerning transfrontier pollution. Paris: OECD, 1974.

______. Environmental Monographs 4. Paris: OECD, 1986.

OLIVEIRA, A. I. A. O licenciamento ambiental. São Paulo: Iglu, 1999.

OLIVEIRA, F. A Economia da dependência imperfeita. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Graal, 1980.

OLIVRY, D. Participation publique à la planification et à la gestion des resources en eau: cas des grands projets hydrauliques. In: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE IMPACT OF LARGE WATER PROJECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Paris: UNESCO/UNEP/IIASA/IAHS, 1986.

ORTOLANO, L. Environmental planning and decision making. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1984.

______. Environmental regulation and impact assessment. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1997.

ORTOLANO, L.; MAY, C. Appraising effects of mitigation measures: the Grand Coulee Dam’s impacts on fisheries. In: MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A.; ARTS, J. (Orgs.), Assessing impact: handbook of EIA and SEA follow-up. London: Earthscan, 2004, p. 97-117.

ORTOLANO, L.; SHEPHERD, A. Environmental impact assessment: challenges and opportunities. Impact Assessment, 13, n. 1, p. 3-30, 1995a.

______. Environmental Impact Assessment. In: VANCLAY, F.; BRONSTEIN, D.A. (Orgs.), Environmental and social impact assessment. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1995b. p. 3-30.

ORTOLANO, L; JENKINS, B.; ABRACOSA, R. Speculations on when and why EIA is effective. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 7, n. 4, p. 285-292, 1987.

OSS, OFFICE OF THE SUPERVISING SCIENTIST FOR THE ALLIGATOR RIVERS REGION Annual report 1985-86. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1986.

PÁDUA, J. A. Natureza e projeto nacional: as origens da ecologia política no Brasil. In: PÁDUA, J. A. (Org.). Ecologia e Política no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Espaço e Tempo/Iuperj, 1987. p. 11-62.

______. O nascimento da política verde no Brasil: fatores exógenos e endógenos. In: LEIS, H. R. (Org.). Ecologia e política mundial. Rio de Janeiro: Fase/Vozes, 1991. p. 135-161.

______. Um sopro de destruição. Pensamento político e crítica ambiental no Brasil escravista (1786-1888). Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 2002.

PÁDUA, M. T. J.; COIMBRA FILHO, A. F. Os parques nacionais do Brasil. Madrid: Instituto de Cooperação Ibero Americana/Instituto de la Caza Fotográfica y Ciências de la Naturaleza, 1979.

PAGE, J. M.; SKINNER, N. T. Writing user-friendly environmental impact documentation. Trabalho não publicado, apresentado na XV Conferência Anual da IAIA — International Association for Impact Assesment —, Quebec, Canadá, jun. 1994.

PALERM, J. Public participation in environmental impact assessment in Spain: three case studies evaluating national, Catalan and Balearic legislation. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 17, n. 4, p. 259-271, 1999.

PANIZZO, A. et al. Great landslide event in italian artificial reservoirs. Natural Hazards and Earth Sciences 5, p. 733-740, 2005.

PARDINI, R. et al. Beyond the fragmentation threshold hypothesis: regime shifts in biodiversity across fragmented landscapes. PLoS ONE, v. 5, n. 10, p. e13666, 2010.

PARENTEAU, R. La participation du public aux décisions d’aménagement. Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office, 1988.

PEARCE, D. Accounting for the future. In: O”RIORDAN, T.; TURNER, R. K. (Org.). An annotated reader in environmental planning and management. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1983. p. 117-122.

PERDICOÚLIS, A.; DURNING, B.; PALFRAMAN, L. Furthering environmental impact assessment: towardes a seamless connection between EIA and EMS. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012.

PERDICOÚLIS, A.; GLASSON, J. The causality premise of EIA in practice. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 27, n.3, p. 247-250, 2009.

PERDICOÚLIS, A.; GLASSON, J. How clearly is causality communicated in EIA? Journal of environmental assessment policy and management, v, 14, n. 3, 1250020 (25 p). 2012.

PERDICOÚLIS, A.; PIPER, J. Network and system diagrams revisited: satisfying CEA requirements for causality analysis. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 28, p. 455-468, 2008.

PEREIRA, J.C.R. Análise de dados qualitativos. São Paulo: Edusp, 3a. ed., 2001.

PETTS, J. Municipal waste management: inequalities and the role of deliberation. Risk analysis, v. 20, n. 6, p. 821-832, 2000.

PINCHEMEL, P.; PINCHEMEL, G. La face de la Terre. Paris: A. Colin, 1988.

PINHO, P.; MAIA, R.; MONTERROSO, A. The quality of Portuguese environmental impact studies: The case of small hydropower projects. Environmental impact assessment review, 27: 189-205, 2007.

PISANIELLO, J. D.; ZHIFANG, W.; MCKAY, J. M. Small dams safety issues – engineering/policy models and community responses from Australia. Water policy, v. 8, p. 81-95, 2006.

PRADO FILHO, J. F.; SOUZA, M. P. Auditoria em avaliação de impacto ambiental: um estudo sobre a previsão de impactos ambientais em EIAs de mineração do Quadrilátero Ferrífero (MG). Solos e rochas, v. 27, n. 1, p. 83-89, 2004.

PRITCHARD, S. Will rare Tanzanian toad stall hydro operation? Internacional water power & dam construction, p. 23, december 2000.

PROCHNOW, M. (Org.). Barra Grande: a hidrelétrica que não viu a floresta. Rio do Sul: Apremavi, 2005.

PROUS, A. Arqueologia brasileira. Brasília: Editora UnB, 1991.

PURNAMA, D. Review of the EIA process in Indonesia: improving the role of public involvement. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 23, p. 415-439, 2003.

RENN, O. Risk perception and risk management. Part I: risk perception. Risk abstracts, v. 7, n. 1, p. 1-9, 1990a.

______. Risk perception and risk management. Part II: risk management. Risk abstracts, v. 7, n. 2, p. 1-9, 1990b.

RESOURCE ASSESSMENT COMMISSION. Kakadu conservation zone inquiry. Final report. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Office, 1991. v. I.

RETIEF, F.; CHABALALA, B. The cost of environmental impact assessment (EIA) in South Africa. Journal of environmental assessment policy and management, v. 11. n. 1, p. 51-68, 2009.

RICH, B. Multi-lateral development banks. Their role in destroying the global environment. The Ecologist, v. 15, n. 1-2, p. 56-68, 1985.

RIDEWAY, B. The project cycle and the role of EIA and EMS. Journal of environmental assessment policy and management, v. 1, n. 4, p. 393-405, 1999.

______. Environmental management system provides tools for delivering on environmental impact assessment commitments. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 23, n. 4, p. 325-331, 2005.

RIJKSWATERSTAAT. Nature across motorways. Delft: Rijkswaterstaat, 1995.

ROBERTS, R. Public involvement: from consultation to participation. In: VANCLAY, F.; BRONSTEIN, D. A. (Orgs.), Environmental and social impact assessment. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1995. p. 221-246.

ROBINSON, A. H. et al. Elements of cartography. 6. ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1995.

RODRIGUES, R. R.; GANDOLFI, S. Conceitos, tendências e ações para a recuperação de florestas ciliares. In: RODRIGUES, R. R.; LEITÃO FILHO, H. F. (Orgs.). Matas ciliares: conservação e recuperação. 2. ed. São Paulo: Edusp, 2001. p. 235-247.

RODRÍGUEZ-BACHILLER, A.; WOOD, G. Geographical information systems (GIS) and EIA. In: MORRIS, P.; THERIVEL, R. (Orgs.), Methods of environmental impact assessment. 2a. ed. London: Spon Press, 2001. p. 381-401.

ROLNIK, R. et al. Estatuto da cidade: guia para implementação pelos municípios e cidadãos. 2a. ed. Brasília: Câmara dos Deputados, Comissão de Desenvolvimento Urbano e Interior/Secretaria Especial de Desenvolvimento Urbano da Presidência da República/Caixa Econômica Federal/Instituto Pólis, 2002.

RONZA, C. Piraju hydroelectric plant: a real case of environmental assessment effectiveness. In: McCABE, M. (Org.). Environmental impact asseessment: Case studies from developing countries. Fargo, IAIA, 1997 (mimeo).

ROSA, J.C.S.; SÁNCHEZ, L.E. Revisiting the EIS of a mining project using ecosystem services. In: IAIA’13 Conference Procedings, Calgary, 2013.

ROSS, W.; MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A.; MARSHALL, R. Common sense in environmental impact assessment: it is not as common as it should be. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 24, n. 1, p. 3-22, 2006.

ROSS, W. A. Evaluating environmental impact statements. Journal of environmental management, v. 25, p. 137-147, 1987.

______. Reflections of an environmental assessment panel member. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 18, n. 2, p. 91-98, 2000.

______. The Independent Environmental Watchdog. A Canadian Experiment in EIA Follow-up. In: IAIA’02, XXI ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR IMPACT ASSESSMENT, DenHaag. Fargo: IAIA, 2002. [CD-ROM.]

ROSSI, G.; ANTOINE, P. Impacts hydrologiques et sédimentologiques d´um grand barrage: l´exemple de Nangbéto (Togo – Benin). Revue de géomorphologie dynamique, v. 39, n. 2, p. 63-77, 1990.

ROSSOUW, N. et al. South Africa. In: SOUTHERN AFRICA INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. Environmental impact assessment in Southern Africa. Windhoek: Southern Africa Institute for Environmental Assessment, 2003. p. 201-225.

ROWAN, M.; STREATHER, T. Converting project risks to development opportunities through SIA enhancement measures: a practitioner perspective. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 29, n.3, 2011. p. 217-230.

RUNNALS, D. Factors influencing environmental policies in international development agencies. In: ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK. Environmental planning and management. Manila: ADB, 1986. p. 185-229.

RUSHU, W. Balancing environment and development. International water power & dam construction, May 2003. p. 34-38.

RYAN, C.H.; BRODY, D.O.B.; LUNDE, A.I. NEPA documents at the US Forest Service: a blessing and a curse? UVP-report, v. 25, n. 4, p. 192-197, 2011.

SACHS, I. Environnement et styles de développement. Annales (économies, sociétés, civilisations), p. 553-570, mai-juin 1974.

SADLER, B. The evaluation of assessment: post-EIS research and process development. In: WATHERN, P. (Org.). Environmental impact assessment: theory and practice. London: Unwin Hyman, 1988. p. 129-142.

SADLER, B. (Org.). Environmental assessment in a changing world: evaluating practice to improve performance. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency International Association for Impact Assessment, 1996.

SALMON, G. M.; HARTFORD, D. N. D. Risk analysis for dam safety. International water power & dam construction, p. 42-47, March 1995.

SÁNCHEZ, L. E. Ecologia: da ciência pura à crítica da economia política. In: SÁNCHEZ, L. E. et al. Ecologia. Rio de Janeiro: Codecri, 1983. p. 7-34.

______. Les Rôles des Études d’Impact des Projets Miniers. Paris: École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris, tese de doutorado, 1989.

______. Considerações preliminares sobre a aplicação da avaliação de impacto ambiental a atividades de mineração no Estado de São Paulo. In: CONVEGNO MINERARIO ITALO-BRASILIANO. Cagliari, 1990. Anais… p. 463-483.

______. Os papéis da avaliação de impacto ambiental. In: SÁNCHEZ, L. E. (Org.). Avaliação de impacto ambiental: situação atual e perspectivas. São Paulo: Epusp, 1993a. p. 15-33.

______. Environmental impact assessment in France. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 13, n. 4, p. 255-265, 1993b.

______. O processo de avaliação de impacto ambiental, seus papéis e funções. In: LIMA, A. L. B. R.; TEIXEIRA, H. R.; SÁNCHEZ, L. E. (Orgs.). A efetividade da avaliação de impacto ambiental no Estado de São Paulo: uma análise a partir de estudos de caso. São Paulo: Secretaria do Meio Ambiente, 1995a. p. 13-19.

______. Análises e discussões. In: LIMA, A. L. B. R.; TEIXEIRA, H. R.; SÁNCHEZ, L. E. (Orgs.). A efetividade da avaliação de impacto ambiental no Estado de São Paulo: uma análise a partir de estudos de caso. São Paulo: Secretaria do Meio Ambiente, 1995b. p. 13-19.

______. As etapas iniciais do processo de AIA. In: GOLDENSTEIN, S. et al. Avaliação de impacto ambiental. São Paulo: Secretaria do Meio Ambiente, Série Documentos Ambientais, 1998. p. 33-55.

______. Desengenharia: o passivo ambiental na desativação de empreendimentos industriais. São Paulo: Edusp, 2001.

______. Auditorías ambientales. In: REPETTO, F. L.; KAREZ, C. S. (Orgs.). Aspectos geológicos de protección ambiental. Montevideo: Unesco, 2002b. p. 88-98.

______. A produção mineral brasileira: cinco séculos de impacto ambiental. In: RIBEIRO, W. (Org.). Patrimônio ambiental brasileiro. São Paulo: Edusp, 2003. p. 125-163.

______. Danos e passivo ambiental. In: PHILIPPI JR., A.; ALVES A. C. (Orgs.). Curso interdisciplinar de direito ambiental. Barueri: Manole, 2005. p. 261-293.

______. On common sense and EIA. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 24, n. 1, p. 10-11, 2006.

______. Avaliação de impacto ambiental e seu papel na gestão de empreendimentos. In: VILELA JR., A.; DEMAJOROVIC, J. (Orgs.), Modelos e ferramentas de gestão ambiental: desafios e perspectivas para as organizações. São Paulo: Senac, 2a. ed., 2010

SÁNCHEZ, L.E. Information and knowledge management. In: PERDICOÚLIS, A.; DURNING, B.; PALFRAMAN, L. (Orgs.). Furthering environmental impact assessment: towars a seamless connection between EIA and EMS. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012, p. 19-38.

SÁNCHEZ, L. E.; CROAL, P. Environmental impact assessment, from Rio-92 to Rio+20 and beyond. Ambiente & sociedade, v. 15, n.3, p. 41-54, 2012.

SÁNCHEZ, L. E.; GALLARDO A. L. F. C. On the successful implementation of mitigation measures. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 23, n. 3, p. 182-190, 2005.

SÁNCHEZ, L. E.; HACKING, T. An approach to linking environmental impact assessment and environmental management systems. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 20, n. 1, p. 25-38, 2002.

SÁNCHEZ, L. E.; MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A. Learning about knowledge management for improving environmental impact assessment in a government agency: The Western Australian experience. Journal of environmental management, v. 92, 2260-2271, 2011.

SÁNCHEZ, L. E.; SILVA, S. S.; PAULA, R. G. Gerenciamento ambiental e mediação de conflitos: um estudo de caso. In: II CONGRESSO ÍTALO-BRASILEIRO DE ENGENHARIA DE MINAS. São Paulo, 1993. Anais p. 474-496.

SÁNCHEZ, L. E. et al. The endless search for scientific information in environmental decision-making: examples from a NIMBY case study. In: IAIA’96, XVI ANNUAL MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Estoril, 1996. Proceedings v. 1, p. 407-412.

SANDHAM, L.A.; PRETORIUS, H.M. A review of EIA report quality in the North West province of South Africa. Environmental impact assessment review v. 28, p. 229-240, 2008.

SANDHAM, L.A.; A.J. VAN HEERDEN, A.J.; JONES, C.E.; RETIEF, F.P.; MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A.N. Does enhanced regulation improve EIA report quality? Lessons from South Africa. Environmental impact assessment review v. 38, p.155-162, 2013.

SANEJOUAND, R. La cartographie géotechnique en France. Paris: Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées, 1972.

SANTOS, M. C. S. R. Manual de fundamentos cartográficos e diretrizes gerais para elaboração de mapas geológicos, geomorfológicos e geotécnicos. São Paulo: Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnológicas, 1989.

SANTOS, L. A. O.; ANDRADE, L. M. M. As hidrelétricas do Xingu e os povos indígenas. São Paulo: Comissão Pró-Índio de São Paulo: 1988.

SANTOS, R. F. Planejamento ambiental: teoria e prática. São Paulo: Oficina de Textos, 2004.

SCHLINDER, W. The impact statement boondoggle. Science, v. 192, p. 509, 1976.

SCHLÜPMANN, K. Direito do cidadão e estrada real – sobre a pré-história da lei da UVP. In: MÜLLER-PLANTENBERG, C.; AB’SÁBER, A. N. (Orgs.). Previsão de impactos. São Paulo: Edusp, 1994. p. 351-376.

SCHOFIELD, D.; COX, C. J. B. The use of virtual environments for percentage view analysis. Journal of environmental management, n. 76, p. 342-354, 2005.

SCHRAGE, M. W. Mapa de ruído como ferramenta de diagnóstico do conforto acústico da comunidade. São Paulo: Escola Politécnica da USP, dissertação de mestrado, 2005.

SECRETARÍA DE LA CONVENCIÓN DE RAMSAR. Manual 11 - Evaluación del impacto. Manuales Ramsar para el uso racional de los humedales. Gland: 2004.

SEINFELD, J. H. Contaminación atmosférica: fundamentos físicos y químicos. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios de Administración Local, 1978.

SERRES, M. Hermès V. Le passage du nord-ouest. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, 1980.

SETRA, SERVICE D’ÉTUDES TECHNIQUES DES ROUTES ET AUTOROUTES. Passages pour la grande faune. Guide technique. Bagneux: Setra, 1993a.

______. L’Eau & la route. Volume 3 — la gestion de la route. Guide technique. Bagneux: Setra, 1993b.

SEWELL, W. R. D. (1981) How Canada responded; the Berger inquiry. In: O’RIORDAN, T.; SEWELL, W. R. D. (Orgs.). Project appraisal and policy review. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1981. p. 77-94.

SHELL INTERNATIONAL B. V. technical guidance for environmental assessment. The Hague: Shell Health, Safety and Environment Panel, 2000.

SHEPHERD, A. Post-project impact assessment and monitoring. In: PORTER, A. L.; FITTIPALDI, J. F. (Orgs.). Environmental methods review: retooling impact assessment for the new century. Atlanta/Fargo: Army Environmental Policy Institute/International Association for Impact Assessment, 1998. p. 164-170.

SHIVA, V. Biopirataria. A pilhagem da natureza e do conhecimento. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2001.

SHOPPLEY, J. B.; FUGGLE, R. F. A comprehensive review of current environmental impact assessment methods and techniques. Journal of environmental management, n. 18, p. 25-47, 1984.

SHRADER-FRECHETTE, K. S. Environmental impact assessment and the fallacy of unfinished business. Environmental ethics, v. 4, p. 37-47, 1982.

SHU-YAN, G. Innovations and firsts in resettlement at Three Gorges. HRW, December 2002. p. 20-23.

SILVA, A. F. D. et al. As incertezas da transposição. Ciência hoje, n. 217, p. 48-52, 2005.

SILVA, G. E. N. Direito ambiental internacional. Rio de Janeiro: Thex, 2002.

SILVA, J. M. C.; FONSECA, M. Uma vitória para a conservação da biodiversidade marinha brasileira. Megadiversidade, v. 1, n. 2, p. 219-221, 2005.

SILVA-SÁNCHEZ, S. S. Cidadania ambiental: novos direitos no Brasil. São Paulo: Annablume/Humanitas, 2a. ed. 2010.

______. Crítica e reação em rede: o debate sobre os transgênicos no Brasil. São Paulo: Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas da USP, tese de doutorado, 2003.

SILVEIRA, J. P. Development of the Brazilian Amazon. Science, v. 292, p. 1651-1652, 2001.

SIMOS, J. Évaluer l’impact sur l’environnement: une approche originale par l’analyse multicritère et la négociation. S.l: Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, 1990.

SLOOTWEG, R. Biodiversity assessment framework: making biodiversity part of corporate social responsibility. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 23, n. 1, p. 37-46, 2005.

SLOOTWEG, R.; VANCLAY, F.; VAN SCHOOTEN, M. Function evaluation as a framework for the integration of social and environmental impact. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 19, n. 1, p. 19-28, 2001.

SMITH, N. A. Unhappy anniversary - the disaster at Bouzey in 1895. International water power & dam construction, p. 40, April 1995.

SNELL, T.; COWELL, R. Scoping in environmental impact assessment: balancing precaution and efficiency? Environmental impact assessment review, v. 26, p. 359-376, 2006.

SOARES, G. F. S. A proteção internacional do meio ambiente. Barueri: Manole, 2003.

SOPPE, M.; PIETERS, S. The Dutch courts and EIA: troubleshooter or troublemaker? In: COMMISSION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (Org.). Environmental impact assessment in the Netherlands. Views from the Commission for EIA in 2002. Utrecht: CEIA, 2002. p. 29-32.

SOUZA, M. A. T. Levantamento arqueológico para fins de diagnóstico de bens históricos, em áreas de implantação de empreendimentos hidrelétricos. In: CALDARELLI, S.B. (Org.). ATAS DO SIMPÓSIO SOBRE POLÍTICA NACIONAL DO MEIO AMBIENTE E PATRIMÔNIO CULTURAL. Goiânia, 1996. p. 22-27.

SOUZA, M. P. Instrumentos de gestão ambiental: fundamentos e prática. São Carlos: Riani Costa, 2000.

SPENSLEY, J. W. National environmental policy act. In: SULLIVAN, T. F. P. (Org.). Environmental law handbook. 13. ed. Rockville: Government Institute, 1995. p. 308-332.

SPRAGENS, L. C.; MAYFIELD, S. M. In safe hands. International water power & dam construction, p. 20-23, April 2005.

STEINEMANN, A. Improving alternatives for environmental impact assessment. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 21, p.3-21, 2001.

STEVENSON, M. G. Indigenous knowledge in environmental assessment. Arctic, v. 49, n. 3, p. 278-291, 1996.

STOLP, A. et al. Citizen values assessment: incorporating citizens’ value judgements in environmental impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, v. 20, n. 1, p. 11-23, 2002.

SUARES, M. Mediación. Conducción de disputas, comunicación y técnicas. Buenos Aires: Paidós, 1996.

SUMMERER, S. O estudo de impacto ambiental: forma jurídica, processo, participantes. In: MÜLLER-PLANTENBERG, C.; AB’SÁBER, A. N. (Orgs.). Previsão de impactos. São Paulo: Edusp, 1994. p. 407-418.

SUSSKIND, L.; CRUIKSHANK, J. Breaking the impasse: consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. New York: Basic Books, 1987.

TCU, Tribunal de Contas da União. Relatório de levantamento de auditoria – Fiscobras 2009, TC 009.362/2009-4. Brasília, 2009.

TCU, Tribunal de Contas da União. Levantamento TC 025.829/2010-6. Brasília, 2011.

TECHNICA LTD. Techniques for assessing industrial hazards: a manual. World Bank technical paper 55, Washington, 1988.

TEIXEIRA, M.G. et al. Análise dos relatórios de impactos ambientais de grandes hidrelétricas no Brasil. In: MÜLLER-PLANTENBERG, C.; AB’SÁBER, A. N. (Orgs.). Previsão de impactos. São Paulo: Edusp, 1994. p. 163-186.

TENNØY, A.; KVÆRNER, J.; GJERSTAD, K.K. Uncertainty in environmental assessment predictions: the need for better communication and more transparency. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 24, n.1, p. 45-56, 2006.

THEYS, J. L’Environnement à la recherche d’une définition. Institut Français de l’Environnement, Note de Méthode n. 1, 1993.

THIBAULT, A. Comprendre et planifier la participation publique. Montreal: Bureau de Consultation de Montreal, 1991.

THOMPSON, M. A. Determining impact significance in EIA: a review of 24 methodologies. Journal of environmental management, n. 30, p. 235-250, 1990.

TOMLINSON, P. The use of methods in screening and scoping. In: CLARK, B.D. et al. (Orgs.). Perspectives on environmental impact assessment. Dordrecht: D. Riedel, 1984. p.163-194.

______. What is the alternative? A practitioner´s response to Benson. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 21, n. 4, p. 275-277, 2003.

TORQUETTI, Z. S. C.; FARIAS, R. S. Barragens industriais em MG: classificação quanto ao potencial de dano. Brasil Mineral, n. 232, p. 32-38, 2004.

TOYNE, P. The reluctant nation. Environment, law and politics in Australia. Sydney: ABC Books, 1994.

TREMBLAY, A.; LUCOTTE, M.; HILLAIRE-MARCEL, C. Mercury in the environment and in hydroelectric reservoirs. In: Great whale environmental assessment background paper, n. 2. Montreal: Great Whale Public Review Support Office, 1993.

TREWEEK, J. Ecological impact assessment. Malden:Blackwell Science, 1999.

TUNDISI, J. Construção de reservatórios e previsão de impactos ambientais no baixo Tietê: Problemas limnológicos. Biogeografia 13, p. 1-19, 1978. (Instituto de Geografia da Universidade de São Paulo)

TURLIN, M.; LILIN, C. Les etudes d’impact sur l’environnement: l’expérience française. Aménagement et nature, n. 102, p.4-7, 1991.

UICN, UNIÃO INTERNACIONAL PARA A CONSERVAÇÃO DA NATUREZA/PNUMA, PROGRAMA DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS PARA O MEIO AMBIENTE/WWF, FUNDO MUNDIAL PARA A NATUREZA. Cuidando do planeta Terra: uma estratégia para o futuro da vida. São Paulo: CL-A Cultural, 1991.

UNEP, UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME. Environmental impact assessment training resource manual. Nairobi/Canberra: UNEP Environment and Economics Unit/Australia Environmental Protection Agency, 1996.

______. APELL for mining. Paris: UNEP Technical Report 41, 2001.

URBAN, T. Saudade do Matão. Relembrando a história da conservação da natureza no Brasil. Curitiba: Ed. UFPR, 1998.

USEPA, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. Policy and procedures for the review of federal actions impacting the environment. Washington: EPA Manual 1640, 1984.

______. Fundamentals of environmental compliance inspections. Rockville: Government Institutes, 1989.

USFWS, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. Habitat evaluation procedures (HEP). Washington: Division of Ecological Services, 102-ESM, 1980.

VAN DER VORST, R.; GRAFÉ-BUCKENS, A.; SHEATE, W. R. A systemic framework for environmental decision-making. Journal of environmental assessment policy and management, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-26, 1999.

VERDON, R. et al. Mercury evolution (1978-1988) in fishes of the la grande hydroelectric complex, Québec, Canada. Water, air & soil pollution, v. 56, n. 1, p. 405-417, 1991.

______. Évolution de la concentration en mercure des poissons du Complexe La Grande. In: CHARTRAND, N.; THÉRIEN, N. (Orgs.). Les enseignements de las phase I du Complexe La Grande. Hydro-Québec/Université de Sherbrooke, 1992. p. 66-78.

VIELLIARD, J. M. E.; SILVA, W. R. E. Avifauna. In: LEONEL, C. (Org.). Intervales. São Paulo: Fundação para a Conservação e a Produção Florestal do Estado, 2001. p. 124-145.

VILLAMERE, J. A.; NAZRUDDIN, N. EIA procedures and guidelines in the Department of Mines and Energy. Jakarta/Halifax, 1992.

VINCENT, S. Consulting the population: definition and methodological questions. In: Great Whale Environmental Assessment Background Paper 10. Montreal: Great Whale Public review Support Office, 1994.

VIOLA, E. O movimento ecológico no Brasil (1974-1986): do ambientalismo à ecopolítica. In: PÁDUA, J.A. (Org.). Ecologia e política no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Espaço e Tempo/Iuperj, 1987. p. 63-109.

______. O movimento ambientalista no Brasil (1971-1991): da denúncia e conscientização pública para a institucionalização e o desenvolvimento sustentável. In: GOLDENBERG, M. (Org.). Ecologia, ciência e política. Rio de Janeiro: Revan, 1992. p. 49-75.

VON BERTALLANFY, L. General System Theory. New York: George Braziller, 1968.

VUONO, Y. S. Inventário fitossociológico. In: SILVESTRE, L. S.; ROSA, M. M. T. (Orgs.). Manual metodológico para estudos botânicos na mata atlântica. Seropédica: Editora Universidade Rural, 2002. p. 50-65.

WALSH, J. World Bank pressed on environmental reforms. Science, v. 236, p. 813-815, 1986.

WANDESFORDE-SMITH, G.; MOREIRA, I. V. D. Subnational government and EIA in the developing world: bureaucratic strategy and political change in Rio de Janeiro: Brazil. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 5, p. 223-238, 1985.

WARD, B.; DUBOS, R. Only one Earth. The care and maintenance of a small planet. New York: Norton, 1972.

WÄRNBÄCK, A.; HILDING-RYDEVIK, T. Cumulative effects in Swedish EIA practice - difficulties and obstacles. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 29, p. 107-115, 2009.

WARNER, L. L.; DIAB, R. D. Use of geographic information systems in an environmental impact assessment of an overhead power line. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 20, n. 1, p. 39-47, 2002.

WATHERN, P. An introductory guide to EIA. In: WATHERN, P. (Org.). Environmental impact assessment: theory and practice. London: Unwin Hyman, 1988a. p. 3-30.

______. The EIA directive of the European Community. In: WATHERN, P. (Org.). Environmental impact assessment: theory and practice. London: Unwin Hyman, 1988b. p. 192-209.

WATTS, R. et al. Failure of the Teton dam: geotechnical aspects. International Water Power and Dam Construction, p. 30-31, July 2002.

WCD, WORLD COMMISSION ON DAMS. Dams and development: a new framework for decision-making. The report of the World Commission on Dams. London: Earthscan, 2000.

WCED, WORLD COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT. Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.

WEAVER, A. EIA and sustainable development: key concepts and tools. In: SOUTHERN AFRICA INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. Environmental impact assessment in Southern Africa. Windhoek: SAIEA, 2003. p. 3-10.

WEBLER; T.; RENN, O. A brief primer on participation: philosophy and practice. In: RENN, O.; WEBLER, T.; WIEDEMANN, P. (Orgs.). Fairness and competence in citizen participation. Dordrechet: Kluwer, 1995. p. 17-33.

WEBSTER, R. D.; FITTIPALDI, J. J. The army’s interest in impacts assessment methods review: relevance and efficiency. In: PORTER, A.L.; FITTIPALDI, J.J. (Orgs.). Environmental methods review: retooling impact assessment for the new century. Atlanta/Fargo: Army Environmental Policy Institute/International Association for Impact Assessment, 1998. p. 15-29.

WEEMS, W. A.; CANTER, L. W. Planning and operational guidelines for mitigation banking for wetland impacts. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 15, n. 3, p. 197-218, 1995.

WEILL, M.A.M.; SPAROVEK, G. Estudo da erosão na microbacia do Ceveiro (Piracicaba, SP). I - Estimativa das taxas de perda de solo e estudo de sensibilidade dos fatores do modelo EUPS. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, v. 32, n.2, p. 801-814, 2008.

WEINER, K. S. Basic purposes and policies of the NEPA regulations. In: CLARCK, R.; CANTER, L. (Orgs.). Environmental policy and NEPA. Past, present and future. Boca Raton: St. Lucie Press, 1997. p. 61-83.

WEISS, E. H. An unreadable EIS is an environmental hazard. The environmental professional, v. 11, p. 236-240, 1989.

WELLES, H. The CEQ NEPA effectiveness study: learning from our past and shaping our future. In: CLARCK, R.; CANTER, L. (Orgs.). Environmental policy and NEPA. Past, present and future. Boca Raton: St. Lucie Press, 1997. p. 193-214.

WENDE, W. Evaluation of the effectiveness and quality of environmental impact assessment in the Federal Republic of Germany. Impact assessment and project appraisal v. 20, n. 2, p. 93-99, 2002.

WENDE, W.; HERBERG, A.; HERZBERG, A. Mitigation banking and compensation pools: improving the effectiveness of impact mitigation in project planning procedures. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 23, n. 2, p. 101-111, 2005.

WESTMAN, W. E. Measuring the inertia and resilience of ecosystems. BioScience, v. 28, n. 11, p. 705-710, 1978.

______. Ecology, Impact Assessment, and Environmental Planning. New York: Wiley, 1985.

WIKLUND, H. In search of arenas for democratic deliberation: a habermasian review of environmental assessment. Impact assessment and project appraisal, v. 23, n. 4, p. 281-292, 2005.

WILKINS, H. The need for subjectivity in EIA: discourse as a tool for sustainable development. Environmental impact assessment review v. 23, p. 401-414, 2003.

WILSON, L. A practical method for environmental assessment audits. Environmental impact assessment review, v. 18; 59-71, 1998.

WINTERHALDER, K. Early history if human activities in the Sudbury area and ecological damage to the landscape. In: GUNN, J.M. (Org.). Restoration and recovery of an industrial region: progress in restoring the smelter-damaged landscape near Sudbury, Canada. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995. p. 17-31.

WOLF, C. P. Social impact assessment: The state of the art. In: PADC, PROJECT APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT CONTROL. Environmental impact assessment. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983. p. 391-401.

WOOD, C. Lessons from comparative practice. Built environment, v. 20, p. 322-344, 1994.

______. Screening and scoping. In: LEE, N.; GEORGE, C. (Orgs.). Environmental assessment in developing and transitional countries. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2000. p. 71-84.

______. Environmental impact assessment. A comparative review. Harlow: Longman, 2a. ed., 2003.

WOOD, D. B. A new twist in the Wal-Mart wars, The Christian Science Monitor, 12 ago. 2004.

WOOD, G. Thresholds and criteria for evaluating and communicating impact significance in environmental statements: ‘see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil’? Environmental impact assessment review, v. 28, p 22-38, 2008.

WORLD BANK. Environmental assessment sourcebook — Volume I. Policies, procedures, and cross-sectoral issues. World Bank Technical Paper 139, Washington, 1991a.

______. Environmental assessment sourcebook — Volume II. Sectoral guidelines. World Bank Technical Paper 140, Washington, 1991b.

______. Environmental assessment sourcebook — Volume III. Guidelines for environmental assessment of energy and industry projects. World Bank Technical Paper 154, Washington, 1991c.

______. Environmental assessment: challenges & good practice. Environment department papers 18, p. 1-24, 1995a.

______. World Bank participation sourcebook. Washington: Environment Department Papers, 1995b.

______. Public consultation in the EA process: A strategic approach. Environmental assessment sourcebook update 26, p. 1-14, 1999.

ZHU, T.; LAM, K.C. Environmental impact assessment in China. Nankai University, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2a. ed., 2010.

ZUQUETTE, L. V.; NAKAZAWA, V. A. Cartas de geologia de engenharia. In: OLIVEIRA, A. M. S.; BRITO, S. N. A. (Orgs.). Geologia de engenharia. São Paulo: Associação Brasileira de Geologia de Engenharia, 1998, p. 283-300.